Recently, the Allahabad High Court stepped in to resolve a deeply emotional custody battle, emphasising that in matters involving children, the law must ultimately bow to the welfare of the child. In a habeas corpus petition, the Court ordered that a 13-month-old child be restored to his father, reaffirming the principle that a natural guardian cannot be denied custody without compelling reasons.
The case arose when the father filed a habeas corpus petition seeking custody of his minor son, who had been living with his maternal aunt and uncle after the death of the child’s mother. The father asserted his status as the natural guardian and highlighted his financial stability and ability to care for the child. He also assured the Court of support from his sister in raising the child.
The Petitioner contended that there was no legal basis to deny him custody, especially when he was capable and willing to provide proper upbringing. On the other hand, the maternal relatives argued that the child, being premature and very young, required special care, which they were already providing. They also raised concerns regarding the circumstances surrounding the mother’s death during an IVF procedure, questioning the father’s suitability.
The Court relied heavily on settled principles governing child custody and habeas corpus jurisdiction, reiterating that “In child custody matters, the paramount consideration is the ‘welfare of the child’ and not rights of the parents…”
It further emphasised that “The mere fact that the death occurred during a failed IVF procedure cannot… be attributed to any fault on the part of the petitioner so as to disentitle him from claiming custody…”
The Court noted that the father, being the natural guardian, had neither abandoned nor neglected the child and was financially and emotionally capable of ensuring proper upbringing. It also highlighted that denying custody at such a tender age could disrupt the natural bond between father and child.
The Court allowed the habeas corpus petition and directed that custody of the minor be handed over to the father immediately. However, to maintain the child’s emotional connection with the maternal family, visitation rights were granted to the relatives every Sunday for two hours.
Case Title: Akshit Pandey (Minor) and Another v. State of U.P. and 6 Others
Case No.: Habeas Corpus Writ Petition No. 365 of 2025
Coram: Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sandeep Jain
Advocate for the Petitioner: Akhilesh Kumar Mishra, Devbratt Yadav, Gaurav Singh, Ram Pratap Yadav
Advocate for the Respondent: Pramod Kumar Srivastava, G.A., Manjari Singh
Read Judgment @Latestlaws.com
Picture Source :
